On Hume's view, our causal inferences are not adequately grounded in inferential processes, nor in our sensible apprehension of the objects, but rather in a propensity of our mind established there by nature, which he calls belief or custom. Hume has not only a destructive account of causation where he critiques the rationalist framework for understanding it, but also a constructive account where he develops his own framework. We compiled a list of valuable resources for grad school applications which you can find here. Philosophy: Philosophy | AcademicPhilosophy | Self-Posts / Test-My-Theory | Aesthetics | Bioethics | ContinentalTheory | PhilosophyOfMath | Neurophilosophy | PoliticalPhilosophy | PhilosophyOfReligion | PhilosophyOfScience | TheAgora | PhilosophyEvents Resources for PhD applications
#Hume causality professional
Level of involvement: (indicated by color) Autodidact Graduate PhD Professional Undergraduate Related Field Related subreddits:Īsk: AskReddit | AskAcademia | AskComputerScience | AskCulinary | AskElectronics | AskEngineers | AskHistorians | AskLiteraryStudies | AskReligion | AskScience | AskSciTech | AskStatistics You can also find information about applying for flair at that page.
You can find the details of our flair system here. As philosophical issues are often complicated and have potentially thousands of years of research to sift through, knowing when someone is an expert in a given area can be important in helping understand and weigh the given evidence. The purpose of flair on /r/askphilosophy is to indicate commenters' relevant expertise in philosophical areas and research.
#Hume causality full
You can find a full list of the subreddit rules here. for a particular answer.Īll other comments are off-topic and will be removed.
not from commenters who don't understand the state of the research on the question)Ĭomments other than answers on /r/askphilosophy should be one of the following:įollow-up questions related to the OP's questionįollow-up questions to a particular answerĭiscussion of the accuracy of a particular answer not inaccurate or false)Ĭome only from those with relevant knowledge of the question (i.e. not one-liners or otherwise uninformative)Īccurately portray the state of research and literature (i.e. arguments in philosophy, philosophers' positions, the state of the field (not questions about commenters' opinions) not extremely broad to the point of unanswerability) Specific enough to reasonably be answered (i.e. not merely tangentially related to philosophy)
Questions on /r/askphilosophy should be:ĭistinctly philosophical (i.e. Also check the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy and Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. r/askphilosophy is not a debate or discussion subreddit.Ĭheck our FAQs for a list of frequently asked questions to see if your question has already been answered. Please have a look at our rules and guidelines. r/askphilosophy is thus a place to ask and answer philosophical questions. We envision this subreddit as the philosophical counterpart to /r/AskHistorians, which is well-known for its high quality answers to historical questions. r/askphilosophy aims to provide serious, well-researched answers to philosophical questions.
0 kommentar(er)
